Venture Once More–Commentary on Poldark, Eps. 4 and 5

Back from my travels with a double edition of Poldark meta! Having rewatched Episode 4 on a TV screen with less exaggerated proportions, I can honestly say that I like this episode best of the ones that have aired so far. Not that there weren’t several WTF? moments, but by and large, the positives outweighed the negatives.

The Poldark Women Trip the Light Fantastic
The Poldark Women Trip the Light Fantastic

 The Good

*The Honeymoon Period: What a difference regular conjugal relations makes, especially for Ross who seemed downright jovial at times! I thought he was all set to have his way with his new bride right there on the kitchen table when he came home (I was relieved for Demelza’s sake that he took her off to bed first). Aidan Turner does have an appealing smile, and it was nice to see it so often during the Happy!Ross scenes. Demelza glows, of course—canonically, she’s always the more sanguine of the two and contentment becomes her.

*Demelza and Verity: The development of their friendship is true to the source material and well-portrayed by both actresses. I like the way they unbend in each other’s company, Demelza becoming more confident in her role as hostess, while Verity takes on the task of teaching her cousin’s wife the finer points of etiquette and deportment. I attribute Demelza’s improved posture by the episode’s end to Verity!

*The pilchard harvest/copper strike: Two feel-good moments, effectively presented in parallel. In both cases, Ross and his associates are Waiting For Something To Happen. I was a little sorry that that the pilchard harvest didn’t take place by moonlight, as it does in the books, but it was still attractively filmed, with women waiting patiently on the cliffs for sight of the fishing boats’ return, then the almost giddy excitement and relief over the catch coming in as the whole community rushes in to claim their share. The copper strike had “Christmas Miracle” stamped all over it, but one would have to be a total Scrooge to begrudge the miners’ good fortune.

*Christmas at Trenwith: One of my favorite sequences in the first novel, and almost everything I liked was retained. The oppressiveness of the Poldark family history that has Demelza overawed on her arrival is straight out of the book—unlike the unpleasant exchange between Francis and Elizabeth before dinner, although it’s plausible, given their deteriorating relationship at this point. The Trenegloses aren’t quite as uncouth as to crash Christmas dinner as they do here, but they do pay a call afterwards, with George Warleggan in tow. And Demelza being sick after dinner, owing to nerves and her pregnancy, then rallying to win over the whole company with her singing, was lovely—as was the rendition of the song itself. And the way Ross’s expression softens as he listens, and he finally begins to realize and appreciate what he’s found in Demelza (in spite of his lingering glance at Elizabeth’s nape earlier in the sequence). I did miss Demelza’s discovery of port, which also gives her the Dutch courage to face her social “betters” and which becomes an endearing quirk of her character.

FarthingWarleggan
A fancy, a feeling, or a Ferrars? Certainly not a Warleggan!

The Bad

*I will never get used to Ross’s tenants calling him by his first name.

*Charles and Ross: While familial affection does exist between them, they aren’t close, and Charles never entrusts Ross with the well-being of Francis or the rest of the Poldark family. Nor does he compare Francis unfavorably to Ross. Charles may have reservations about his son but he would never have voiced them to Ross, who is too much the son of Joshua, the reckless, rakish younger brother with whom the more conventional Charles never got along. (I very much regret that neither Poldark 75 nor Poldark 15 dramatized the Charles/Joshua scene at the start of Book One, because Joshua turns out to cast a very long shadow.) In fact, the whole Ross >>>>>>Francis angle feels very overplayed.

*For some inexplicable reason, the screenwriters passed up a golden opportunity to mount a very important gun on the wall—namely, George Warleggan’s attraction to Elizabeth. When he accompanies the Trenegloses on their Christmas visit to Trenwith, he has eyes only for her, especially during her musical performance. He very much covets his neighbor’s refined, gracious, blue-blooded wife, and that becomes a major complication in the ongoing saga. It was one of the best reasons I could imagine for introducing George early in the series, and they completely dropped the ball on it—much as they have on most of George’s other defining characteristics: his ambition, his ruthlessness, his barely concealed resentment of and burning desire for acceptance by the landed gentry. This George comes across as a sneering aristocrat (the resemblance to Hugh Grant in his “posh frock” days doesn’t help), not a driven but tightly controlled up-and-comer determined to buy and maneuver his way into power and social prestige.

 

Demelza's Approach to Theft (Not Ladylike But It Gets The Job Done)
Demelza’s Approach to Theft (Not Ladylike But It Gets The Job Done)

The WTF?

*Ross’s imprudent marriage causes gossip, but not social ostracism. And he doesn’t lose any backers for Wheal Leisure over it—not even Dr. Choake.

*Still no explanation as to why Nicholas Warleggan is absent, but the less important Cary Warleggan is retained.

*Ross has an annoying habit of making unilateral decisions without taking Demelza’s feelings or opinions into account—inviting Verity to stay, accepting the Christmas invitation to Trenwith. Or making much of an effort to talk her around to his POV. He also seems to expect her to adapt immediately to her changed status and criticizes her when she doesn’t, which seems neither fair nor kind. I know this version of Demelza is softer, more outwardly vulnerable, and more easily squashed than either the books’ or ’75 series incarnation. But I hope she does gain enough confidence to stand up to Ross eventually or he’ll steamroll right over her. One thing I loved about Rees’s Demelza is that she was never shy about giving Ross what-for when she disagreed with him.

*From Ross galloping along the Cliffs of Alienation, we now transition to Francis staring out over the Sea of Inadequacy. Brooding appears to run in the Poldark genes.

Episode 5

Sad to say, I found this installment anticlimactic, after the emotional payoffs of the previous episode. I suspect that is largely attributable to the transition from Ross Poldark to Demelza, which is a much darker novel. I hope there will be an improvement as the events of Book Two unfold. Still, there were some things to enjoy, even if there were more things to shake one’s head over, especially if—like me—you’re coming to the series primarily as a book reader.

PoldarkParents
Proud Parents

The Good

*Ross and Demelza’s happiness about becoming parents. I always liked Ross being perfectly happy with having a daughter as his firstborn instead of a son. It’s kind of a pity, though, that the comic elements of Demelza’s delivery weren’t dramatized: Ross dragging Choake away from his breakfast to minister to his laboring wife, Choake’s wig flying off in a gale, Ross bewildered by all the younger Martin children waiting in his kitchen while Jinny and Mrs. Zacky attend to Demelza—and safely deliver Julia before Choake even arrives.

*Verity’s expression when Ross agrees that maybe he does want to have Demelza and Elizabeth: a cross between “TMI, Cousin!” and “Men are pigs!” I’m not surprised she walked away from him after that. Of course, in this day and age, Ross probably could have both women…

*Demelza becoming subtler and learning how to keep secrets from Ross in what she sees as a good cause. It’s an occasional bone of contention between them later, but it’s true to her development as a character. Plus, it shows a growing autonomy.

*While I’m not a fan of the new series’ effort to soften Elizabeth, they are doing a good job in showing her all-consuming preoccupation with Geoffrey Charles. I don’t think it’s giving too much away to say that motherhood becomes her consolation for a less than satisfactory love life.

 

The Bell Tolls For Grambler
The Bell Tolls For Grambler

The Bad

*Is it really necessary to make Francis even more of a failure than he is in the novels? Having him lose Grambler in a card game is overkill—not to mention something of a cliché that I’ve repeatedly encountered in Regency romances. Grambler does close, but it’s mainly because it’s no longer yielding enough copper and the cost of unwatering the mine to seek out new lodes is prohibitive. In the ’75 series, Grambler’s closing is portrayed as a haunting flashback from Francis’s POV, as he stares into space, drink in hand and the clock ticking loudly in the background, reliving the moment when he had to shut down the family inheritance and put all his miners out of work. The only thing I liked about this version’s portrayal of the same event was Francis writing “Resurgam” on the wall. (In the book, he writes it on the side of the boiler.)

Richard Morant as Dwight Enys in Poldark (1975)
Richard Morant as Dwight Enys in Poldark (1975)

*Changing Dwight’s backstory wasn’t necessary, either. I suppose the screenwriters thought it would simplify things to have him and Ross already know each other from the war, but that seems to age Dwight and make some of his impending errors of judgment less youthful and more stupid. Dwight originally enters as a guest at Julia’s christening: a newcomer to the community, very recently qualified as a physician, earnest, idealistic, hard-working (this Dwight hasn’t even been shown practicing medicine yet—I thought they might have him deliver Demelza’s baby, but no), and full of zeal to try new medical ideas and approaches. Dwight is also the first friend Ross and Demelza make after their marriage, which may not seem significant but is, because he accepts Demelza straight off, without holding her origins against her. Finally, the actor playing Dwight in the new series is sadly bland, without a fraction of the charisma or screen presence of Richard Morant, who played the role in the ’75 version. That was one hot young doctor!

*Eliminating Julia’s double christening: In the book, Ross humors Demelza’s desire to keep the classes separate by holding two christening parties, making Tom Carne’s deliberate attendance on the wrong day all the more dramatic and potentially catastrophic. It also underscores Demelza’s ongoing insecurities about having married into the landed gentry and her fear about never finding acceptance among them. The new series’ choice to simplify that subplot made for rather tepid viewing instead of fireworks.

*Speaking of tepid viewing, the formation of the secret Carnmore Copper Company—which should have been more exciting and dramatic—seemed muted and furtive. And while Ross canonically plays his cards close to the vest with this scheme, Aidan Turner’s portrayal was almost too low-key and subdued. You had to wonder why his Ross was chosen to be the leader, when he appeared so hesitant about claiming any responsibility for the scheme in the first place.

*Keren and Mark Daniel: This isn’t one of my favorite storylines by a long shot, but at least in the book, the characters’ motivations are more fleshed-out. Keren is on the make, but she’s also a very young girl trying to escape the hardships of life as a traveling player, as well as the unwelcome advances of several men in the troupe. Mark is socially awkward, inexperienced with women, and dazzled by this girl who’s completely out of his sphere. At bottom, neither really knows or understands the other, and neither knows what he or she is getting into when they marry, which sows the seeds for future tragedy. None of that comes across in the new series so far—both characters appear one-dimensional (simple miner and calculating hussy) and likely to remain so, unfortunately.

A Bad Time For Courtship, Captain!
An Awkward Time For Courtship, Captain!

The WTF?

*Making Keren’s traveling theatre troupe more “high-brow” by having them perform a Shakespeare play (All’s Well That Ends Well, one of his more obscure works into the bargain) instead of a popular melodrama of the day. Also, did it really take Ross five acts to notice that his pregnant wife hadn’t returned from stretching her legs? Talk about oblivious…

* Francis’s snide comment about finding “a price for Mama” was slapworthy. Lady or not, Elizabeth should have thrown the teapot at his head for that remark. That said, there is a little too much emphasis on Saintly Elizabeth: the failure of that marriage is attributable to both parties, and I’ll be annoyed if the new series glosses that over.

*Still no indication that George secretly hankers after Elizabeth. I’m starting to suspect this drawling, foppish incarnation secretly hankers after Francis–or Ross!

*Blamey’s sense of timing—pouring out his heart to Verity while a riot rages around them—leaves a lot to be desired.

*The riot itself is set up much more clearly in the book. It begins as a protest against exorbitant corn prices being charged by a local merchant (the Warleggan cousin, Sanson, is also involved) and escalates when the hungry miners storm the warehouse to take the grain instead. Couldn’t we have had some of those details instead of repeated shots of various Poldarks standing on cliffs and staring at the sea?

*Ross has his Cliffs of Alienation, Francis has his Sea of Inadequacy, now Verity has her Storm Clouds of Heartache, and Demelza her Breaking Waves of Childbirth. This family’s relationship with Nature is nothing if not fraught—and picturesque!

Until next time!

 

 

 

8 thoughts on “Venture Once More–Commentary on Poldark, Eps. 4 and 5

    1. Hi, Rosie–

      Thanks for stopping by! I don’t have a problem with Elizabeth being more likable so much as I have issues with the new series simplifying the character for apparently no other reason than to make her more likable. I’m a lover of the books, first and foremost, and Graham’s Elizabeth is a complicated, greyer, and more complex figure than Poldark 2015 presents her as being. She’s a good woman, overall: refined, gracious, ladylike, and mostly tolerant and fair-minded. But she’s also very conventional, conservative, somewhat limited in her social views, occasionally self-absorbed, and a bit vain about her looks. She’s been raised in the expectation that her beauty and breeding will secure her a husband who will take care of her and provide her with the finer things in life: an honorable name, a high social position, and a handsome home. She would dearly love to move in more exalted circles than provincial Cornwall provides–like London or even Bath. None of which are terrible things to want, and I’m open to a more nuanced depiction of the character than the 1975 series sometimes provided (though Jill Townsend looked and sounded the part far better than Heida Reed).

      But for me, the new series turning Elizabeth into this nice, sweet girl who was pressured by her mother into marrying Francis when she really wanted Ross, and then does all these saintly things like making over her own ball gowns to spare her husband’s pride and visiting her sick rival after the latter saves her child (which never happened in the book) does a disservice to Graham’s more layered creation. His Elizabeth made it clear that Francis was her choice and that she considered hers and Ross’s to be a “boy and girl” attachment. It’s not necessary to make Elizabeth so much better than she is in the source material, any more than it’s necessary to make Francis worse. Graham had a firm handle on both characters, their virtues and their flaws, and I wish the screenwriters would respect his vision more instead of recasting it in such black and white terms.

  1. *While I’m not a fan of the new series’ effort to soften Elizabeth, they are doing a good job in showing her all-consuming preoccupation with Geoffrey Charles. I don’t think it’s giving too much away to say that motherhood becomes her consolation for a less than satisfactory love life.

    I disliked the 1975 series’ attempt to transform Elizabeth into some kind of one-note villainess who stood in the way of Ross and Demelza’s happiness. I found that so infantile. And I really felt sorry for Jill Townsend, who was forced to portray Elizabeth in that manner, despite her best efforts to portray the character as complex as possible. At least the book was willing to portray Elizabeth as a complex woman, who was both pragmatic and very internalized. At least Heida Reed seemed to fare better, thanks to Debbie Horsfield’s attempt to allow audiences to get to know Elizabeth better.

    Also, the 1975 series used parental pressure as an excuse why Elizabeth had decided to go ahead and marry Francis.

    By the way, I don’t consider Kyle Soller’s portrayal of Francis as “black-and-white”. People seemed to forget that these first two books – especially “Demelza” portrayed Francis at his lowest. He doesn’t become more likable until “Jeremy Poldark”, which will be adapted in the upcoming Series 2.

    1. While parental pressure may have been one factor in Elizabeth’s decision to marry Francis, the novels made it clear that she did believe at the time that Francis was the better matrimonial choice. And I agree that Graham’s Elizabeth is much more complex than either TV incarnation. She is admirable in some ways, flawed in others. What I do think 1975 series got right is the sense of entitlement Elizabeth sometimes displays as an acknowledged beauty–she expects to be admired, cherished, and celebrated because of her extraordinary looks. She would love to go to London or Bath to receive the admiration she feels is her due, and she does get sullen and discontented when that doesn’t happen.

      I do think the 1977 series does a better job with Elizabeth, and Jill Townsend was able to show more of the character’s depth (beautiful speaking voice, by the way, and I thought so even when Elizabeth was at her least likable). You do see her more sympathetic traits more clearly, and she proves to be a devoted and formidable mother. Her love for Geoffrey Charles and Valentine is her defining trait–I honestly believe that she loves them better than she loves herself. Personally, I’m not charmed by Heida Reed’s Elizabeth, because I don’t recognize this rather bland, sweet “nice girl” as Graham’s character and I don’t think Graham would, either. And don’t even get me started on the new series’ concept of George Warleggan.

      We’ll have to agree to disagree on KS’s Francis. Yes, in the first two books, Francis shows plenty of weaknesses as a husband and a businessman, but he had his moments of wit and charm too, and I feel Poldark 2015 makes his faults more glaring than they need to be. Losing Grambler in a card game, for example. That doesn’t happen in the novels–Grambler closes due to lack of accessible lodes and insufficient funds to unwater the mine to look for more. The only reason it seems to happen in the new series is to show what a loser Francis is and how pathetic and irresponsible when compared to Ross. It’s about as subtle as a “Goofus and Gallant” comic strip. I feel sorry for KS having to play someone who goes through most of the series looking either like a kicked puppy or a petulant child. I am going to hope that the character and actor get more of a chance to shine because Francis’s redemptive arc in Book 3 is so memorable and CF knocked it out of the park in 1he 1975 series.

      Thank you for stopping by. I always enjoy discussing Poldark in its various forms.

  2. I do think the 1977 series does a better job with Elizabeth, and Jill Townsend was able to show more of the character’s depth (beautiful speaking voice, by the way, and I thought so even when Elizabeth was at her least likable). You do see her more sympathetic traits more clearly, and she proves to be a devoted and formidable mother. Her love for Geoffrey Charles and Valentine is her defining trait–I honestly believe that she loves them better than she loves herself. Personally, I’m not charmed by Heida Reed’s Elizabeth, because I don’t recognize this rather bland, sweet “nice girl” as Graham’s character and I don’t think Graham would, either. And don’t even get me started on the new series’ concept of George Warleggan.

    Elizabeth fared better in the 1977 series, because Winston Graham had a hand in the production, unlike the 1975 series.

    I have no problem with Heida Reed’s portrayal of Elizabeth. I noticed that she is trying to be as likable as possible, but I can see that the strain of Francis’ hostility and her own regret is slowly becoming obvious. Ross will make it even difficult for her in the second series . . . if Debbie Horsfield allows this to happen.

    1. I understand that Graham was more involved in the second series–he wrote about his experiences fairly extensively in Poldark’s Cornwall. I personally prefer the 2nd series myself for all the reasons I’ve previously stated.

      I’m not sold on HR’s Elizabeth. While I’m not opposed to a more nuanced portrayal of the character, I’d prefer to see her flaws–vanity, self-absorption, indecisiveness, self-entitlement–acknowledged rather than glossed over or another character (Francis) further vilified to make her appear more of a victim. Francis and Elizabeth both bear the blame for the failure of their marriage, and it feels like lazy, shallow writing to make Francis the sole culprit.

  3. *For some inexplicable reason, the screenwriters passed up a golden opportunity to mount a very important gun on the wall—namely, George Warleggan’s attraction to Elizabeth. When he accompanies the Trenegloses on their Christmas visit to Trenwith, he has eyes only for her, especially during her musical performance. He very much covets his neighbor’s refined, gracious, blue-blooded wife, and that becomes a major complication in the ongoing saga. It was one of the best reasons I could imagine for introducing George early in the series, and they completely dropped the ball on it—much as they have on most of George’s other defining characteristics: his ambition, his ruthlessness, his barely concealed resentment of and burning desire for acceptance by the landed gentry. This George comes across as a sneering aristocrat (the resemblance to Hugh Grant in his “posh frock” days doesn’t help), not a driven but tightly controlled up-and-comer determined to buy and maneuver his way into power and social prestige.

    It sounds as if you wanted the story regarding Elizabeth and George to be rushed. Trust me . . . Debbie Horsfield didn’t drop the ball. Not by a long shot. Which I am sure you must have discovered by the end of Episode 8.

    1. Graham himself made George’s attraction to Elizabeth obvious in Book One(!)–even before the Christmas visit at Trenwith. Since Horsfield, et al, claim to be more faithful to the novels, I was naturally expecting them to follow Graham’s lead on that. Instead, there wasn’t even a scintilla of interest from George toward Elizabeth in Episode 4, which seemed like a baffling choice. He seemed more concerned with slinking around after Francis and Ross, dripping poison in their ears. And by the time the new writers started showing George eyeing Elizabeth in Episode 6, it came across almost as an afterthought. And I frankly cringed over the ham-handed pass he made at her in Episode 8. It wasn’t just clumsy, it was stupid. Graham’s George was shrewd enough to play his cards close to the chest and not let Elizabeth see how much he wanted her. Readers knew what he was after, but Elizabeth didn’t. She saw only a friend who admired her and who brought her son–his godson–gifts.

      Anyway, I freely admit to not liking the new series’ take on George at all. Every time Farthing minces onscreen looking posher than posh, I want to gather up all my copies of the Poldark saga–all 12 volumes, hardcover, paperback, and even video–and throw them at Horsfield and the casting director for perpetrating such a blunder!

Comments are closed.